Dec 11, 2015

AstraZeneca (Seroquel) CEO David Brennan sees huge pay jump - HOW CRIME PAYS QUITE HANDSOMELY

AstraZeneca (Seroquel) CEO David Brennan sees pay jump to £9.1m - HOW CORPORATE CRIME PAYS QUITE HANDSOMELY


As countless injured Seroquel litigants are now being pushing & dumped into the streets by unscrupulous ambulance chaser law firms (many of those will cont. to suffer on in abject poverty without ever seeing the slightest shred of justice unto their death); And even after those DOJ (Department of Justice) fines, the massive health damage inflicted upon the general public, the ever growing volumes of documented corp crimes: AstraZeneca Chief David Brennan sees pay jump to £9.1m.

That's right folks, in that other select members only  (TO BIG TO HOLD ACCOUNTABLE) world of corporate crime, pay offs, political wrangling, billion dollar legal teams, and the untold billions in ill gotten profits... CRIME PAYS....& it PAYS OFF BIG TIME

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From The Telegraph UK

AstraZeneca chief David Brennan sees pay jump to £9.1m

AstraZeneca chief executive David Brennan saw his total pay climb to more than £9.1m in 2011, after an increased payout from a share award which vested last year.

AstraZeneca chief David Brennan sees pay jump to £9.1m
Mr Brennan's 2008 share award also vested last year, with a value of £5.8m, the annual report shows. Photo: PA
The pay hike happened despite concern about Astra's pipeline of new drugs, as it faces a looming "patent cliff", with several of its best-selling medicines losing exclusivity and facing competition from cheaper generic versions in the next few years.

Last week, the company had to pull the plug on an anti-depressant it was developing, incurring a $50m (£31.3m) charge, and in February announced 7,000 job cuts to save money.

Mr Brennan's base pay rose 2.5pc to £997,223 in 2011, and including a bonus and other payments, was up 11pc to £3.37m, according to the pharma company's annual report.

His 2008 share award also vested last year, with a value of £5.8m, the annual report shows.
The size of the share award was increased by 25pc by the board, after Astra came top of its peer group between 2008 and 2010.


Mr Brennan turned down any increase in his base pay for 2012, the report shows.

South Carolina Attorney General reaches $26M settlement against AstraZeneca for "


SC Attorney General reaches $26M settlement against AstraZeneca

Published: Thursday, August 23, 2012 at 5:46 p.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, August 23, 2012 at 5:46 p.m.
The S.C. Attorney General's Office has secured a $26 million settlement against the multi-billion pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca for violating the state Unfair Trade Practices Act by willfully misleading consumers on the potentially serious side effects of the anti-psychotic drug Seroquel.
The settlement order was filed Aug. 22 and is the third award, and final case against anti-psychotic drug manufacturers in South Carolina, that the Attorney General's Office has prosecuted since 2009. The cases began under former Attorney General Henry McMaster, who contracted with the Spartanburg law firm of Harrison, White, Smith and Coggins to prosecute the case on behalf of the state. The Spartanburg firm then contracted with two other firms in Columbia and Houston to assist with the litigation, which continued under Attorney General Alan Wilson.
In the lawsuit order, the company agreed to pay $26 million, which includes $20 million in damages and restitution to the state, $5 million in penalties and $1 million in trial costs. In 2010, AstraZeneca had $5.3 billion in worldwide sales including $3.75 billion in the U.S.
Bryan Stirling, deputy attorney general, said the settlement is fair to the state. A portion of the funds will go into the general fund, some will go to Medicaid and other funds to insurance companies.
Stirling said the Attorney General's Office sued on behalf of the state and the state agencies that paid additional funds because of the medication side effects.
AstraZeneca did not admit any wrongdoing or violation, but agreed to pay the sum to resolve the state action, according to the order signed by Circuit Court Judge Roger Couch."


AstraZeneca - Seroquel - Army Apologizes for Seroquel Death

From the ArmyTimes

DoD cracks down on off-label drug use


By Patricia Kime - Staff writer
Posted : Thursday Jun 14, 2012 10:01:04 EDT
A letter landed in Stan White’s mailbox in Cross Lanes, W.Va., in April.
It began: “On behalf of the men and women of the U.S. Armed Forces … I extend my sincerest and deepest sympathy for the loss of your sons.”

But the note wasn’t simply a condolence. The message from Air Force Lt. Gen. Brooks Bash informed White that U.S. Central Command had decided in March to remove the powerful antipsychotic drug Seroquel from its approved formulary list.

Under the new rules, CENTCOM doctors now must request a waiver if they write a prescription for Seroquel, also known as quetiapine.

The change is a small victory for White, who had already lost one son to combat and has sought restrictions on the drug he believes contributed to the death of a younger son.

Marine Cpl. Andrew White died Feb. 12, 2008, at age 23 from a lethal combination of medications prescribed for post-traumatic stress disorder, mainly clonazepam, quetiapine and paroxetine — the latter two known to sometimes affect the heart’s regular rhythm.

“I have never been one to say I’m opposed to medication — I’m just opposed to these medications, which have a side effect of causing cardiac arrest,” White said June 6.

Off-label use soars

Prescriptions for Seroquel have exploded in the past decade, especially in the armed forces, where it often is prescribed off-label as a sleep aid.

In 2003, service members were diagnosed with insomnia at a rate of 30 per 10,000; by 2009, the rate had risen to 226 per 10,000. Prescriptions for Seroquel, or quetiapine, have subsequently soared, multiplying 27-fold in the same time period.

The drug is known to cause drowsiness and chase away nightmares associated with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Navy Capt. Mike Colston of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs said medications become popular as providers learn about them and as they receive new approvals for use by the Food and Drug Administration — in the case of quetiapine, as an add-on therapy for antidepressants.
Yet questions have been raised over whether its off-label use for insomnia was more than a grass-roots movement by physicians. In April 2010, manufacturer Astra-Zeneca agreed to pay $520 million to the federal government to settle a civil suit alleging that it illegally marketed Seroquel for a host of off-label uses such as Alzheimer’s disease, anxiety, PTSD and sleeplessness.

According to The Associated Press, in 2009, the Pentagon spent $8.6 million on the drug, while the Veterans Affairs Department spent $125.4 million.

Recent moves by the Pentagon to restrict prescriptions for atypical antipsychotic drugs were the result of a search for safe, proven therapies for troops, Colston said.

“We aim to … discourage the use of off-label medication treatments with antipsychotic medications before established evidence-based strategies have been implemented,” he said.

Earlier this year, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Dr. Jonathan Woodson asked the military services to monitor prescriptions for atypical antipsychotic medications, a class of drugs that includes quetiapine.
The medications are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. But in the past decade, their popularity has soared for off-label use, including for treating PTSD and insomnia.

A 2011 study of 692 patients prescribed quetiapine at Madigan Army Medical Center, Wash., showed just 9.4 percent received it for an FDA-approved use, while 57 percent received it for insomnia.
In 2011, the services issued 54,581 prescriptions for Seroquel alone, the most for any antipsychotic medication — more than 2.5 times the number of prescriptions for the second-most prescribed atypical antipsychotic, Abilify, and nearly four times the number for risperidone, according to information obtained by a Military Times under a Freedom of Information Act request.

A growing alarm

Quetiapine has the strongest somnolent effect of all atypical antipsychotics, and is commonly prescribed troops for relieving nightmares.

But as its popularity has grown, evidence has mounted pointing to links between atypical antipsychotics and irregular heartbeat and even death — prompting critics and physicians, including Woodson, to sound the alarm on frequent prescriptions.

“Providers should use caution when these agents are used as sleep aids in service members struggling with substance use disorders, especially given the risk of such side effects as glucose dysregulation and cardiac effects,” Woodson wrote Feb. 22.

A study in the January 2009 New England Journal of Medicine found the rate of sudden cardiac death doubled for those taking atypical antipsychotic drugs, and there were three such deaths per year for every 1,000 patients taking the medication.

The risk of a fatal heart event also increased with dosage, and study author and Vanderbilt University researcher Wayne Ray said mixing these medications with others that cause irregular heartbeat, known medically as QT prolongation, could worsen the issue and possibly cause death.

“We saw this strong relationship between the antipsychotics and sudden death … and all the information we had pointed to the drugs as the cause,” Ray said after the study was published. “Our findings … would suggest avoiding other medications that prolong QT whenever possible because when you give two together, you’re … increasing the patient’s risk.”

The Madigan study, conducted by Army Lt. Col. Vincent Mysliwiec and presented last June at a meeting of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, showed that of 692 patients who took quetiapine, 126 were monitored for heart arrhythmia within six months of starting on the drug, and of those, 11 showed an abnormal heart rhythm.

Ten of those cases were directly attributed to quetiapine; when the medication was stopped, their heart rhythm returned to normal, according to Psychiatric News.

Through an Army spokesman, Mysliwiec declined to release the study but said it was available to Defense Department physicians on request.

A 2008 Dutch study also showed patients taking more than one QT-interval-prolonging drug had 4.8 times the risk of cardiac arrest.

‘He just died’

White attributes his son’s death, and those of at least three others from West Virginia — Army Pfc. Derick Johnson, 22; Army National Guard Sgt. Eric Layne, 29; and Marine Cpl. Nicholas Endicott, 24 — to at least two heart-rhythm-altering drugs, quetiapine and paroxetine.

Since their cases were publicized, others have stepped forward, including Alicia McElroy, whose husband, Army National Guard Staff Sgt. James McElroy, 30, was found dead in his barracks while receiving treatment for PTSD at Fort Benning, Ga.

She said that among his many medications were Paxil, Seroquel and Klonopin.
“This wasn’t a long, slow death. It wasn’t an overdose. He wasn’t found unconscious. He just died,” said Alicia McElroy, who is still awaiting autopsy results. Her husband died June 6, 2011.

Seroquel maker AstraZeneca stands behind the safety record of its medication, which it made exclusively until March 2012, when the patent expired.

“Patient safety is a priority for AstraZeneca, and we think Seroquel is safe and effective when it’s used as recommended,” Stephanie Andrzejewski said.

She added the company does not condone prescribing Seroquel for off-label uses.
“We trust doctors to use medical judgment in … determining when it is appropriate to prescribe medications,” she said.

In July 2011, the FDA required AstraZeneca to add a warning to the drug’s label regarding its potential cardiac risk.

The services take action

The service surgeons general have responded to Woodson’s request for their policy guidance on atypical antipsychotics, Defense Department spokesman Navy Capt. Michael Colston said June 4. According to documents released by Colston:

• The Army decided risperidone should not be prescribed because its risks outweigh its benefits, and providers who prescribe other such drugs, including quetiapine, “must clearly document their rationale” and receive informed consent from the patient.

• The Navy Department agreed to monitor providers and flag those who prescribe the most atypical antipsychotics off-label for additional review.

• The Air Force, which prescribes atypical antipsychotics to “fewer than 0.15 percent of airmen,” will review provider prescribing practices and counsel those who show a pattern.

• The Washington, D.C., area medical command will conduct periodic evaluations of drugs prescribed to patients with PTSD and follow-up evaluations to see whether further monitoring is needed.

White, who had another son, Army Sgt. Robert White, killed in combat, said he is glad the military is moving away from medications for PTSD.

“I know people who have died from medication,” he said. “I don’t know anyone who’s ever been killed by counseling.”

Staff writer Andrew Tilghman contributed to this report.

---------------------------------------------

for further reading on this topic Pharmalot has written a related article 

The US Military And Off-Label Antipsychotic Use

By Ed Silverman // June 14th, 2012

But growing concern over links between antipsychotics – especially Seroquel, which is the most widely prescribed antipscyhotic by the US military – and irregular heartbeats is prompting moves to restrict usage. For instance, a retrospective review of 692 patients who were prescribed Seroquel at the Madigan Army Medical Center in 2007 and 2008 found that only 3.4 percent received the drug for an approved use, which would also include adjunct treatment for depression.

However, 60 percent received the drug for insomnia, 19 percent for anxiety, 12 percent for mood disorders and 8 percent for post-traumatic stress disorder. Yet, only 18 percent were screened for irregular heartbeats and 126 underwent an EKG, with 11 percent showing abnormal heart rhythms, according to a presentation at the American Academy of Sleep Medicine annual meeting (here is the presentation – see page A179).

Such findings underscore the concerns. Last year, the armed services issued 54,581 prescriptions for Seroquel alone, the most for any antipsychotic — and more than 2.5 times the number of prescriptions for the second-most prescribed atypical antipsychotic, Abilify, and nearly four times the number for Risperdal, according to information obtained by Military Times under a Freedom of Information Act request.

In 2003, Military Times reports, service members were diagnosed with insomnia at a rate of 30 per 10,000. By 2009, the rate had jumped to 226 per 10,000. Prescriptions for Seroquel rose 27-fold in the same time period. And according to The Associated Press, in 2009, the Pentagon spent $8.6 million on the drug, while the Veterans Affairs Department spent $125.4 million. That same year, results of a proof-of-concept study showed Seroquel benefited patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (see this and this).

Meanwhile, a 2008 study in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology showed patients taking more than one drug that can cause irregular heartbeats had 4.8 times the risk of cardiac arrest (look here). A study the following year in The New England Journal of Medicine found the rate of sudden cardiac death doubled for those taking atypical antipsychotics, and there were three such deaths each year for every 1,000 patients taking such a drug (here is the abstract). The risk of a fatal heart event also increased with dosage, the Military Times notes.

Moreover, mixing antipsychotics with others that cause irregular heartbeat, known medically as QT prolongation, could cause more harm and, possibly, death.

**read full article at the link provided above**

Seroquel, sexual favors and unretracted research papers

From CounterPunch Why Are These Fraudulent Papers Unretracted? by Martha Rosenberg


Why Are These Fraudulent Papers Unretracted?

by MARTHA ROSENBERG
"According to Science Times[1], the Tuesday science section in the New York Times, scientific retractions are on the rise because of a “dysfunctional scientific climate” that has created a “winner-take-all game with perverse incentives that lead scientists to cut corners and, in some cases, commit acts of misconduct.”
But elsewhere, audacious, falsified research stands unretracted–including the work of authors who actually went to prison for fraud!
Richard Borison, MD, former psychiatry chief at the Augusta Veterans Affairs medical center and Medical College of Georgia, was sentenced to 15 years in prison for a $10 million clinical trial fraud[2] but his 1996 US Seroquel® Study Group research is unretracted.[3] In fact, it is cited in 173 works and medical textbooks, misleading future medical professionals.[4]
Scott Reuben, MD, the “Bernie Madoff” of medicine who published research on clinical trials that never existed, was sentenced to six months in prison in 2010.[5] But his “research” on popular pain killers like Celebrex and Lyrica is unretracted.[6] If going to prison for research fraud is not enough reason for retraction, what is?
Wayne MacFadden, MD, resigned as US medical director for Seroquel in 2006, after sexual affairs with two coworker women researchers surfaced[7], but the related work is unretracted and was even part of Seroquel’s FDA approval package for bipolar disorder.[8]"
Read the article in its entirety here

MORE ASTRAZENECA NEWS
CEO David Brennan Quits Under Pressure From Investors 
Brennan Quits 
"While the company would not comment about his retirement package, which is still being finalised, Brennan could walk away with about £5m – after receiving more than £9m in pay, perks and shares last year.
Shares in the group, which also announced a 38% drop in three-month profits to £1.34bn and a reduction in its 2012 earnings target, were the biggest fallers in the FTSE 100, down 6.1% at £26.66, wiping £2.2bn from the company's market value.
Brennan will be replaced temporarily by finance director Simon Lowth from 1 June. Former Volvo boss Leif Johansson will take over as chairman from Louis Schweitzer, 69, on the same day – three months earlier than planned. Johansson will then lead the hunt for a permanent successor to Brennan. Headhunters Spencer Stuart have been hired to scout out internal and external candidates.
Brennan, 58, said he had been contemplating his departure for some time and told the board formally of his intention to quit on Wednesday, following private conversations with the chairman. The board then decided to accelerate the process by appointing Lowth as interim CEO, a move backed by Brennan.
Both Brennan and Schweitzer were reportedly encouraged to retire earlier than planned by non-executive directors on the board. However, Brennan insisted: "The decision to retire was entirely my decision. I've been contemplating it for a while. It was time to give someone else the chance to take the company to the next level."
He said he wanted to spend more time with his family (he is married with four grown-up children and has six grandchildren) and to "figure out ways to influence healthcare from a different position"."

Pharmaceutical Corporate Corruption in an Elitist Government

Pharmaceutical Corporate Corruption in an Elitist Government – AstraZeneca Seroquel & Who’s Not Looking Out For You…conflicts of interest alert

Seroquel was approved by the FDA in 1997. So let’s do a little fuzzy math 
adding up the number of years Seroquel has been on the market 1997 – 2011 = 14 years. 
we can guess-timate that it starts out as a billion dollar a year drug and
is now a 5+ billion dollar a year drug = which in a low ball guess-timation
ball parks out @ some where in the neighborhood of 30 – 50 billion dollars 
in total revenue. (THAT'S NOT CHUMP CHANGE)

Now we’ll factor in a 520 million dollar fine paid to the federal government
& another 86 million to the States for their criminal off label marketing
and fraud charges. (Remember, AstraZeneca in this sweet heart deal admitted No Guilt
or any Wrong Doing)

Add in another 1 billion they are spending on their super dream team legal efforts
& the few hundred million they are offering to settle tens of thousands of civil 
litigation claims for the hidden and buried serious damage seroquel has caused 
to our citizenry. We can round up into the roughly 2 billion dollar range.

So when you take away 2 billion from between 30 & 50 billion in profitable sales; 
you can see clearly that corporate crime pays quite handsomely. 
Now it’s not even over…that patent is still running and the profits keep piling up in
mountain sized piles of cash…..

place that in a context that this is just one drug out of hundreds that have used 
these same horrendous criminal tactics to make countless billions. 
Does anyone have to even wonder why we have an unsustainable financial 
health crisis in America? 

We are being fleeced and burdened with unsafe drugs causing untold major health 
consequences for patients, while we are paying through the nose at the same time.
Talk about running the ultimate con game and crime syndicate.

So you would think our government representatives would want to do something
about this correct! What if they are very much part of the problem and crimes?
What solutions do we have then?

from bloomberg news

Strong double-digit sales growth at CER for Crestor, Symbicort and Seroquel XR.
Crestor and Seroquel franchise sales now exceed $5 billion each for the
full year.


from pharmagossip


via salem-news.com
We are losing the war on drugs because of people in high office whose hands are deep in the pockets of the maker of OxyContin, Purdue Pharma!
Eric Holder, our current Attorney General, went from prosecuting bad guys to shielding them. In 2001, Darrell McGraw Jr., the longtime Democratic attorney general of the state of West Virginia, filed a civil case against Purdue Pharma alleging that the privately held pharmaceutical company had engaged in "coercive and deceptive" marketing of OxyContin.
McGraw further charged that Purdue had used misleading advertisements and had promoted the inappropriate use of OxyContin for minor pain. His lawsuit further stated that Purdue had offered doctors free trips to “pain management” seminars where the firm pitched the drug as safe and effective for treating minor pain – without mentioning the drug was supposed to be used only for severe pain and easily abused.
McGraw also alleged that Purdue had told “pharmacists that they can get in trouble if they do not fill prescriptions, even if they believe someone may be an abuser of the drug.” He maintained that the firm’s underhanded practices had caused users in West Virginia to become addicted to the drug.
And he noted that while Purdue’s annual sales revenue from OxyContin had surpassed $1 billion, the state of West Virginia was saddled with the cost of treating people who had become addicted due to misuse of the drug -- encouraged by Purdue Pharma.
The lawsuit was a big worry to Purdue -- very specifically they had a lot to lose financially. This suit was a serious threat to the corrupt drugmaker, and they eventually called in Eric Holder, an attorney working for Covington and Burling in Washington, DC to cover up their deceptive deeds.
The morning the case was to go to trial, in November 2004, Holder helped negotiate a settlement. Working in the judge’s chambers in West Virginia, he put together an agreement under which the firm would have to pay $10 million over four years into drug abuse and education programs in West Virginia -- and Purdue Pharma would not have to admit any wrongdoing!
Eric Holder managed to keep the criminal activity of Purdue Pharma quiet since there would be no trial and no documents or testimony to be made public. Did Holder's "hands in the pockets of Purdue Pharma" allow this epidemic of OxyContin death and addiction throughout the country to perpetuate? Many people think it did.



from www.law.com
Financial disclosure statements filed with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics show that Eric Holder Jr., Jeh Johnson, Ronald Kirk and Tom Vilsack reaped the profits from being Am Law 100 partners. (Hat Tip: Politico.)
Holder, Obama's nominee for attorney general, made $3.3 million at Covington & Burling last year, a number that includes deferred compensation. The AG-to-be (barring an unexpected senatorial rejection) stands to earn between $1 million and $5 million from Covington as part of a separation agreement with the firm.
Holder also will receive a repayment of anywhere between $500,000 and $1 million from Covington's capital account. Politico reports that Covington's retirement plan also might pay Holder nearly $500,000. If confirmed as AG, Holder's annual salary would be $196,700. Holder previously served as deputy attorney general at Main Justice during the Clinton administration.

from Covington & Burling

Covington has one of the world's most active and respected Pharmaceutical Litigation and Investigations Practices, with over 110 firm lawyers engaged in this work.  Drawing on the expertise of the firm's pre-eminent FDA regulatory practice, our litigators have helped guide some of the world's leading pharmaceutical companies through all aspects of difficult investigations and lawsuits.  Covington represents more pharmaceutical companies in more criminal and civil investigations by federal and state government agencies, including high-profile congressional inquiries -- such as the Food & Drug Administration, the Department of Justice, Congress, and State Attorneys General -- than any firm in the country.  Our litigation experience is broad, encompassing many areas including, suits under the False Claims Act, product liability litigation, patent litigation, pricing and antitrust litigation, litigation with federal agencies, and insurance coverage disputes.

Pharmaceutical Investigations
As investigations often precede litigation, our firm has deep experience serving as national coordinating counsel, handling document-intensive litigation, working with experts, and managing multi-jurisdictional and class action proceedings for pharmaceutical manufacturers.  The firm regularly advises pharmaceutical clients on a wide array of enforcement and regulatory proceedings, including the Anti-Kickback Statute, the Medicaid rebate statute, the Prescription Drug Marketing Act, the False Claims Act, the Stark physician referral statute, and state anti-fraud and consumer protection laws. With the assistance of our offices in London and Brussels, we also handle investigations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

In addition to Executive branch investigations, Covington has also assisted numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers in preparing for high-profile congressional inquiries.  We have a team of lawyers with experience on both sides of the aisle in the House and the Senate.  Covington’s team of former government lawyers, includes a Deputy Associate Attorney General, a U.S. Attorney (EDNY), two Assistants to White House Counsel, eight AUSA's (including one from Boston), two DOJ Civil Fraud Section Attorneys, and three DA's.  Through our numerous legislative representations, we have developed a deep appreciation of the benefits of being forthcoming in these investigations, the value of developing a positive relationship with both majority and minority staff and educating them on the substance of their inquiries, and the importance of effectively preparing witnesses for congressional hearings. Our lawyers are also experienced at handling the public relations and media relations challenges that often accompany political investigations, including preparing and implementing "crisis management" plans that dovetail with our legal strategies. 

The Practical Law Company (PLC) ranked Ethan Posner, Mark Lynch, and Geoffrey Hobart as being leading lawyers in the Pharmaceutical Fraud & Abuse Investigations field.  These rankings reflect our lawyers' superior industry knowledge and proven ability to protect clients' interests in a broad range of investigations and related litigation.

Pharmaceutical Litigation
Covington is one of the most active firms in the country on a broad range of pharmaceutical litigation.  Our litigators draw on the expertise of the firm's preeminent Food and Drug Practice, which comprises 40 lawyers, including two who served as Chief Counsel of the Food and Drug Administration.  Our lawyers serve as regulatory and legislative counsel for numerous manufacturers and also industry groups such as PhRMA (Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America); CHPA (Consumer Healthcare Products Association); EFPIA (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations); NPC (National Pharmaceutical Council); and AHI (Animal Health Institute).

False Claims Act: In today's world, government investigations often proceed in tandem with private class actions and qui tam lawsuits under the False Claims Act. We have experience with investigations alleging wrongdoing during clinical research, violations of the Prescription Drug Marketing Act, billing fraud, kickbacks and violations of the Stark self-referral law, and violations of good manufacturing practices.  We represent companies in all phases of an investigation, from subpoena compliance to trial.  Our experience includes handling the private class actions that arose out of two of the largest health care matters in history -- the cases involving overbilling allegations against National Medical Enterprises/Tenet Healthcare Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories.

Products Liability Litigation: Covington has defended many product liability claims on behalf of clients in the food, drug, and chemical industries, and has played a central role in defending against actions seeking to establish new scientific theories of causation and novel theories of liability.  We presently serve as national coordinating counsel for Hoffmann-La Roche in Accutane product liability litigation; national coordinating counsel in all pharmaceutical products liability litigation for the Consumer Healthcare Products Association (CHPA), the Washington, DC based trade association for nonprescription drug manufacturers; and we are responsible for economic injury cases involving OxyContin.

Patent Litigation: The firm successfully combines its regulatory and antitrust expertise in handling Hatch-Waxman and other patent cases and associated antitrust litigation. Representative litigation work includes: coordinating Monsanto's litigation of several cases involving interrelated biotechnology patents, as well as antitrust and trade secret issues; defending SmithKline Beecham against claims of patent infringement; defending GlaxoSmithKline for alleged patent antitrust violations; prosecuting suits for patent infringement on behalf of clients such as Key Pharmaceuticals, Caliper Life Sciences, and Monsanto Company; and a pending ANDA case for Johnson & Johnson.

Pricing and Antitrust Litigation: We have successfully litigated many complex civil and criminal antitrust and consumer protection matters, including nationwide class actions, consolidated multidistrict cases, short-fuse preliminary injunction proceedings, and appeals up through the U.S. Supreme Court.  Our experience encompasses jury and bench trials in state and federal courts and before administrative agencies. Representative matters include: Boehringer Ingelheim in pending Canadian import litigation; GlaxoSmithKline and Purdue Pharma in patent/antitrust litigation; a major Rx client in a Department of Justice criminal grand jury investigation; Warner-Lambert in the In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation; and, related state court lawsuits.  We also serve as antitrust counsel to the National Pharmaceutical Council, Consumer Healthcare Products Association, Pharmacogenetics Working Group (EU and US scientific representatives from 22 major pharmaceutical companies), and well over a dozen other trade associations in the food and drug area and related fields.

Litigation with Federal Agencies: Our litigators have extensive experience representing pharmaceutical manufacturers that challenge FDA actions and those that intervene to defend agency actions.  For example, we have both overturned FDA decisions denying pediatric exclusivity to our clients and defended FDA decisions granting pediatric exclusivity.  We also have deep expertise in handling "reverse" Freedom of Information Act cases, where manufacturers assert their interests in the confidentiality of proprietary information sought by competitors, watch-dog groups or others.

Insurance: The firm has a leading national practice in litigating insurance coverage disputes for policyholders, and has handled many cases for pharmaceutical manufacturers both in court trials and in private arbitrations, including both domestic and international proceedings.  We recovered approximately $1.5 billion in coverage for Dow Corning breast implant liabilities, and are currently representing several major pharmaceutical manufacturers in confidential arbitrations seeking coverage for major product liability cases.
Representative Matters
  • Lead counsel to Pfizer on numerous investigations into physician interaction practices and the marketing and promotion of various prescription drugs by the Department of Justice, multiple state Attorneys General, Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
  • Lead counsel to GlaxoSmithKline in a Department of Justice investigation into physician payments, sales and marketing issues and good manufacturing practices, as well in federal and state lawsuits challenging AWP drug pricing.
  • Lead counsel to Boehringer Ingelheim in the Canadian import antitrust litigation.
  • Representation of Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in a California antitrust and unfair competition case challenging a contract authorizing the sale of an "authorized generic" version of P&GP's Macrobid.
  • National coordinating counsel for Hoffmann-La Roche and Roche Laboratories Inc. -- Covington managed all aspects of a nationwide lawsuit alleging that Accutane causes depression, psychosis, suicide, violence, and other psychiatric side effects. Covington also managed all political aspects of this controversy. Drawing on the substantial experience of our lawyers in dealing with the House Energy and Commerce Committee, we worked closely with the committee staff over an 18-month period to provide documents and other requested information. The Committee ultimately held a day-long hearing in December 2002, and we prepared company executives to testify, including Roche's President and CEO, George Abercrombie.
·  Lead counsel to Purdue Pharma in OxyContin® antitrust and consumer protection class actions.
·  Lead counsel to Johnson & Johnson in an investigation by the Department of Justice into alleged off-label promotion and managed care relationships.
  • ·  Lead counsel to InterMune and Medicis in Department of Justice investigations of alleged off-label marketing and promotion.
More Representative Matters
Accolades
  • PLC Cross-border Super League
    • Ranked 1st in the Life Sciences Regulatory Super League (2004-2011)
    • Ranked 1st in the Life Sciences Industry Super League (2005-2009)
  • PLC - Life Sciences, Which Law Firm?  (2006-2009)
    • Leading: Government Enforcement & Investigations, USA
    • Highly Recommended: Product Liability, England
    • Recommended: Product Liability, USA
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39692892/Public-Financial-Disclosure-Report-Eric-Holder
Public Financial Disclosure Report Eric Holder