I hate stress. I haven't been getting a lot of sleep recently. Why? Stress. We are house hunting. We actually have sold our house and have just over two months, preferably less, before we have to be out of our house. And today starts craft show season where I am busy every weekend now through mid December.
And house hunting is no fun. We sold our house quite quickly. We haven't found a house to buy. Well we have made several offers - we lost the first tone because they misled us and let us think they had other offers in. Then they wanted to keep taking other offers until we sold our house. The next house had an accepted offer in by the time we got ours in - two days after it went on the market. The third house seller actually went with another offer, even though we think ours was higher.
Last weekend we thought we found 'the' house. We made an offer which was accepted. We had a home inspection and found that house has so many problems its barely livable. The minor stuff mold in the attic, failing lolly columns which support the first floor, and a completely rotted out back wall that needs to be replaced. All are significant safety issues so we said no. (And now the house is back on the market with no mention of any of the issues.)
Yesterday we found another house. We are making an offer. We have our fingers crossed. And the stress goes on.
At least its not medical stress. Well there is some of that as well as my knee doctor has told me I am not a good candidate for ACL repair surgery because of my RA. We are in 'wait and see' mode for another few months.
momtyp the media information about the health of the world in the form of recipes, healthy living, health equipment, reliable therapists, and others.
Oct 3, 2016
Sep 26, 2016
Another 'Upside' to Breast Cancer Treatment
Its not enough that breast cancer treatment consists of slashing, poisoning and burning. These leave a physical and emotional toll that can include additional ailments, including new cancers. One of them is nice rare one without much available research and a high mortality rate - angiosarcoma. Please read and enjoy the following:
"Physicians have long noticed that breast cancer patients who have had surgery or radiation therapy have an heightened risk of developing angiosarcoma, a rare type of cancer that originates in the lining of the blood vessels.
Now, researchers at Loyola University Health System in Maywood, Ill., have focused in on a finding that could be a possible precursor to angiosarcoma. With further research this finding could lead to more definitive markers that could predict those who are most likely to develop the disease. Angiosarcoma is a malignant, rapidly growing, highly invasive type of cancer that has a high mortality rate.
In a case study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, researchers at Loyola identified what at first appeared to be only a tiny bruise on the right breast of a 63-year-old woman. Four years prior the woman had had a lumpectomy in the breast and radiation therapy for cancer. She had also had chemotherapy and hormone therapy.
“Normally, when you see a benign-appearing vascular lesion, you probably would pass it up,” said Dr. Joshua Mandrell, a dermatologist who co-authored the report. “But given her history, we biopsied it and it did show that it was an atypical vascular lesion.”
Atypical vascular lesions are abnormal vascular growths that are thought to form in response to trauma, such as that caused by surgery and radiation therapy, according to the study. The lesions are so rare that few medical professionals are aware of their existence. There are also no well defined prognosis factors or treatment guidelines for them.
“Atypical vascular lesions are not completely benign blood vessel growths and are not angiosarcoma. They are right in the middle. They are atypical enough that we suggest in our study that they warrant treatment,” Mandrell said. “The thought is that they could potentially become angiosarcomas.”
How lovely is that? When I searched on cancer.org's website for angiosarcoma, this is what I found:
"This form of cancer starts in cells that line blood vessels or lymph vessels. It rarely occurs in the breasts. When it does, it usually develops as a complication of previous radiation treatments. This is an extremely rare complication of breast radiation therapy that can develop about 5 to 10 years after radiation. Angiosarcoma can also occur in the arms of women who develop lymphedema as a result of lymph node surgery or radiation therapy to treat breast cancer. (For information on lymphedema, see the section "How is breast cancer treated?") These cancers tend to grow and spread quickly. Treatment is generally the same as for other sarcomas. See Sarcoma: Adult Soft Tissue Cancer."
That was all that was listed. And when I went to the link for sarcoma, it was not even mentioned. Nice.
I can't wait. I had radiation and have lymphedema. I'll just add this to my list of crap to look out for. And if its related to cancer, it is all crap.
"Physicians have long noticed that breast cancer patients who have had surgery or radiation therapy have an heightened risk of developing angiosarcoma, a rare type of cancer that originates in the lining of the blood vessels.
Now, researchers at Loyola University Health System in Maywood, Ill., have focused in on a finding that could be a possible precursor to angiosarcoma. With further research this finding could lead to more definitive markers that could predict those who are most likely to develop the disease. Angiosarcoma is a malignant, rapidly growing, highly invasive type of cancer that has a high mortality rate.
In a case study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, researchers at Loyola identified what at first appeared to be only a tiny bruise on the right breast of a 63-year-old woman. Four years prior the woman had had a lumpectomy in the breast and radiation therapy for cancer. She had also had chemotherapy and hormone therapy.
“Normally, when you see a benign-appearing vascular lesion, you probably would pass it up,” said Dr. Joshua Mandrell, a dermatologist who co-authored the report. “But given her history, we biopsied it and it did show that it was an atypical vascular lesion.”
Atypical vascular lesions are abnormal vascular growths that are thought to form in response to trauma, such as that caused by surgery and radiation therapy, according to the study. The lesions are so rare that few medical professionals are aware of their existence. There are also no well defined prognosis factors or treatment guidelines for them.
“Atypical vascular lesions are not completely benign blood vessel growths and are not angiosarcoma. They are right in the middle. They are atypical enough that we suggest in our study that they warrant treatment,” Mandrell said. “The thought is that they could potentially become angiosarcomas.”
How lovely is that? When I searched on cancer.org's website for angiosarcoma, this is what I found:
"This form of cancer starts in cells that line blood vessels or lymph vessels. It rarely occurs in the breasts. When it does, it usually develops as a complication of previous radiation treatments. This is an extremely rare complication of breast radiation therapy that can develop about 5 to 10 years after radiation. Angiosarcoma can also occur in the arms of women who develop lymphedema as a result of lymph node surgery or radiation therapy to treat breast cancer. (For information on lymphedema, see the section "How is breast cancer treated?") These cancers tend to grow and spread quickly. Treatment is generally the same as for other sarcomas. See Sarcoma: Adult Soft Tissue Cancer."
That was all that was listed. And when I went to the link for sarcoma, it was not even mentioned. Nice.
I can't wait. I had radiation and have lymphedema. I'll just add this to my list of crap to look out for. And if its related to cancer, it is all crap.
Sep 19, 2016
Cutting the last cord
What happens after all the treatment? Cancer patients are diagnosed and then get all kinds of care to make sure it doesn't come back (which is our greatest fear).
At the end of treatment, all of a sudden this constant care by all kinds of medical people to check you over and reassure you that it hasn't come back comes to a screeching halt. At this point, the doctors all say come back in 3, 6, or 12 months and we will check again. And the patient says 'whhhaaattt? But what if it comes back? Who will know?'
This is the most frequent time for patients to wig out and require emotional support from a support group or therapist to make sure they don't go off the deep end. It is a very stressful time. You are alone with the little thoughts in the middle of the night - what if it comes back?
With breast cancer, its a little different. You get surgery and chemotherapy. Medical personnel is all around to be aware of a single sneeze. Then some get radiation as well where you are seen daily for weeks on end. At the end of this time most go on to hormonal therapy - Tamoxifen, Femara, Aromasin, or the other one who's name I can't remember right now. That lasts for five to ten years. And then finally you are on your own and you see your oncologist maybe once a year.
I went through this a long time ago when I had thyroid cancer. At the end of about six months of doctor appointments I was left to cope on my own. And I can tell you in some ways it really sucked big time. And left me with some strong emotional issues that took a long time to recover from.
When I was diagnosed with breast cancer, I told myself I was not going to let cancer suck any happiness out of my life and went to support groups before my first surgery. Then I got a therapist at the end of radiation as well. But I was still on hormonal medication - 2 years of Tamoxifen and then Femara.
Yesterday I went to see my oncologist and she said it was time for me to end Femara - that last little pill to help prevent it from coming back. She said she had mentioned this at my visit last year but since I can't remember last week, never mind last year, I had no memory of this.
Basically while there is lots of data on the benefits of staying on Tamoxifen for ten years there is no research now to prove there is any benefit to staying on Femara or other aromatase inhibitors for longer than five years. There are ongoing studies on this but no results yet. This research will take years because they are following women after five years of Femara.
My oncologist brought up the joint pain issues I have. She said that one of the side effects of Femara was joint pain. I couldn't tell you if I am experiencing this or not. All I can remember is after chemo, I went on Tamoxifen and started feeling better because I wasn't in chemo any more. Then after two years of Tamoxifen I went on Femara and again started feeling better again because the side effects of Tamoxifen can be pretty bad. But I have no idea how I would feel not being on Femara because pre-breast cancer I was a much healthier person.
So now the plan is I am off Femara for now through Labor Day. That should give enough time for it to leave my system and see if I have any fewer pains or if I get too worried. My oncologist brought up the stress of recurrence fears, not me. She said at that time, I can always decide to go back on it if I want.
I am happy to take one less pill each day. But it has been the last stand against recurrence. So now I have to learn to live without the benefits of anything to prevent recurrence. For now, I think I can live with this. But if my mind starts playing tricks on me with this recurrence crap, I may wimp out and decide to go back on it.
At the end of treatment, all of a sudden this constant care by all kinds of medical people to check you over and reassure you that it hasn't come back comes to a screeching halt. At this point, the doctors all say come back in 3, 6, or 12 months and we will check again. And the patient says 'whhhaaattt? But what if it comes back? Who will know?'
This is the most frequent time for patients to wig out and require emotional support from a support group or therapist to make sure they don't go off the deep end. It is a very stressful time. You are alone with the little thoughts in the middle of the night - what if it comes back?
With breast cancer, its a little different. You get surgery and chemotherapy. Medical personnel is all around to be aware of a single sneeze. Then some get radiation as well where you are seen daily for weeks on end. At the end of this time most go on to hormonal therapy - Tamoxifen, Femara, Aromasin, or the other one who's name I can't remember right now. That lasts for five to ten years. And then finally you are on your own and you see your oncologist maybe once a year.
I went through this a long time ago when I had thyroid cancer. At the end of about six months of doctor appointments I was left to cope on my own. And I can tell you in some ways it really sucked big time. And left me with some strong emotional issues that took a long time to recover from.
When I was diagnosed with breast cancer, I told myself I was not going to let cancer suck any happiness out of my life and went to support groups before my first surgery. Then I got a therapist at the end of radiation as well. But I was still on hormonal medication - 2 years of Tamoxifen and then Femara.
Yesterday I went to see my oncologist and she said it was time for me to end Femara - that last little pill to help prevent it from coming back. She said she had mentioned this at my visit last year but since I can't remember last week, never mind last year, I had no memory of this.
Basically while there is lots of data on the benefits of staying on Tamoxifen for ten years there is no research now to prove there is any benefit to staying on Femara or other aromatase inhibitors for longer than five years. There are ongoing studies on this but no results yet. This research will take years because they are following women after five years of Femara.
My oncologist brought up the joint pain issues I have. She said that one of the side effects of Femara was joint pain. I couldn't tell you if I am experiencing this or not. All I can remember is after chemo, I went on Tamoxifen and started feeling better because I wasn't in chemo any more. Then after two years of Tamoxifen I went on Femara and again started feeling better again because the side effects of Tamoxifen can be pretty bad. But I have no idea how I would feel not being on Femara because pre-breast cancer I was a much healthier person.
So now the plan is I am off Femara for now through Labor Day. That should give enough time for it to leave my system and see if I have any fewer pains or if I get too worried. My oncologist brought up the stress of recurrence fears, not me. She said at that time, I can always decide to go back on it if I want.
I am happy to take one less pill each day. But it has been the last stand against recurrence. So now I have to learn to live without the benefits of anything to prevent recurrence. For now, I think I can live with this. But if my mind starts playing tricks on me with this recurrence crap, I may wimp out and decide to go back on it.
Sep 12, 2016
Over- and Under-Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer
I found this interesting discussion on over and under diagnosis of breast cancer and how to avoid it. Its definitely worth the read.
The big take away I found in the article is that the best way to avoid overdiagnosis is to get screening done at a breast center where the radiologists read mammograms daily. Through their jobs, they see many more breast images than other radiologists who are not as specialized and much more apt to correctly diagnose breast cancer.
Also, better education of patients and oncologists will also help with preventing over-treatment. Often the first reaction at a cancer diagnosis is 'get rid of it now and make sure it doesn't come back!' Fear takes over and the reaction of a patient goes instantly to get rid of it.
But maybe if the patient takes time to educate themselves on treatment possibilities the fear can be controlled. And the doctor is educated enough to provide the support to help the patient make the best choices and not the impulsive choices. Then the chance of over treatment can be reduced.
I think that this issue of over treatment and over diagnosis for many ailments needs more awareness and focus. We need better trained medical personnel who are able to better read screening images and provide better diagnoses. We also need additional training for medical personnel to help patients make better decisions. Finally we need more information available for patients to reduce the fear at diagnosis so they are able to make better decisions.
The big take away I found in the article is that the best way to avoid overdiagnosis is to get screening done at a breast center where the radiologists read mammograms daily. Through their jobs, they see many more breast images than other radiologists who are not as specialized and much more apt to correctly diagnose breast cancer.
Also, better education of patients and oncologists will also help with preventing over-treatment. Often the first reaction at a cancer diagnosis is 'get rid of it now and make sure it doesn't come back!' Fear takes over and the reaction of a patient goes instantly to get rid of it.
But maybe if the patient takes time to educate themselves on treatment possibilities the fear can be controlled. And the doctor is educated enough to provide the support to help the patient make the best choices and not the impulsive choices. Then the chance of over treatment can be reduced.
I think that this issue of over treatment and over diagnosis for many ailments needs more awareness and focus. We need better trained medical personnel who are able to better read screening images and provide better diagnoses. We also need additional training for medical personnel to help patients make better decisions. Finally we need more information available for patients to reduce the fear at diagnosis so they are able to make better decisions.
Sep 6, 2016
Progesterone too?
So I have always wondered, what about progesterone in breast cancer treatment. A big part of your breast cancer diagnosis is its hormone status. My breast cancer was the most common type - ER+/PR+/Her2-. That translates to estrogen and progesterone positive and her2 negative.
This determines a big part of your treatment. If you are estrogen positive you are treated with Tamoxifen and/or one of the aromatase inhibitors. If you are Her2 positive, you can receive Herceptin. But no one ever said anything about progesterone. I always wondered why it was part of the diagnosis if it didn't affect treatment. I mean why bother?
But now things have changed. New research has found a way to control progesterone as well:
"Cancers with progesterone receptors are known for growing more slowly, however scientists have not been able to exploit this fact until they discovered the way they interact with estrogen, which causes the growth of some tumors"
"In the new study, researchers found that progesterone receptors interact with estrogen receptors in the tumor, changing their behavior and slowing the tumor's growth."
"Roughly 75 percent of women with breast cancer have tumors with the estrogen receptor, and 75 percent of those tumors also have progesterone receptors -- suggesting more than half of these patients could benefit if the treatment is shown to be successful."
And the outcome should be a cheap and safe treatment option.I'm all for this.
This determines a big part of your treatment. If you are estrogen positive you are treated with Tamoxifen and/or one of the aromatase inhibitors. If you are Her2 positive, you can receive Herceptin. But no one ever said anything about progesterone. I always wondered why it was part of the diagnosis if it didn't affect treatment. I mean why bother?
But now things have changed. New research has found a way to control progesterone as well:
"Cancers with progesterone receptors are known for growing more slowly, however scientists have not been able to exploit this fact until they discovered the way they interact with estrogen, which causes the growth of some tumors"
"In the new study, researchers found that progesterone receptors interact with estrogen receptors in the tumor, changing their behavior and slowing the tumor's growth."
"Roughly 75 percent of women with breast cancer have tumors with the estrogen receptor, and 75 percent of those tumors also have progesterone receptors -- suggesting more than half of these patients could benefit if the treatment is shown to be successful."
And the outcome should be a cheap and safe treatment option.I'm all for this.